use FR_MAX_PACKET_CODE instead of PW_CODE_MAX

as rad_packet_ok() already tosses packets >= FR_MAX_PACKET_CODE

Author: alandekok

src/include/radsniff.h

@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ typedef struct rs_stats_value_tmpl rs_stats_value_tmpl_t;
 #endif
 
 typedef struct rs_counters {
-	uint64_t type[PW_CODE_MAX];
+	uint64_t type[FR_MAX_PACKET_CODE];
 } rs_counters_t;
 
 /** Stats for a single interval
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ typedef struct rs_malformed {
 typedef struct rs_stats {
 	int			intervals;		//!< Number of stats intervals.
 
-	rs_latency_t		exchange[PW_CODE_MAX];  //!< We end up allocating ~16K, but memory is cheap so
+	rs_latency_t		exchange[FR_MAX_PACKET_CODE];	//!< We end up allocating ~16K, but memory is cheap so
 							//!< what the hell.  This is required because instances of
 							//!< FreeRADIUS delay Access-Rejects, which would artificially
 							//!< increase latency stats for Access-Requests.

src/main/radsniff.c

@@ -1530,7 +1530,7 @@ static void rs_packet_process(uint64_t count, rs_event_t *event, struct pcap_pkt
 		 *	CoA and Disconnect Messages, as we get the average latency across both
 		 *	response types.
 		 *
-		 *	It also justifies allocating PW_CODE_MAX instances of rs_latency_t.
+		 *	It also justifies allocating FR_MAX_PACKET_CODE instances of rs_latency_t.
 		 */
 		rs_stats_update_latency(&stats->exchange[current->code], &latency);
 		rs_stats_update_latency(&stats->exchange[original->expect->code], &latency);