Summary
The current migration doc (Migrating from Windows PowerShell 5.1 to PowerShell 7)
is a feature overview, not a migration guide. It tells readers what PowerShell 7 offers
but not how to migrate. The differences doc is a thorough technical reference,
but it is not actionable — it lists what changed without explaining what to do about it.
This proposal restructures the migration story into a hub-and-spoke model:
- Rewrite the existing migration doc as a phased playbook (assess → install → migrate → validate)
- Add 7 new deep-dive articles covering the top community pain points
- Link to the existing differences doc for technical reference (no duplication)
Pain points covered (with issue evidence)
Every proposed article addresses real pain points backed by community issue data:
| Pain point |
Evidence (PowerShell/PowerShell) |
Proposed article |
| Module compatibility confusion |
#4062 (63 comments), #15428 (33 comments) |
module-compatibility-strategy.md |
| PSModulePath + OneDrive conflicts |
#15552 (109 comments) |
module-compatibility-strategy.md |
| Encoding changes (UTF-8 NoBOM) |
#1995 (201 comments), #707 (22 comments) |
encoding-changes.md |
| Remoting endpoint defaults to WinPS |
#11616 (32 comments) |
Hub article (Phase 4) |
| Air-gapped network slow startup |
#10983 (58 comments) |
enterprise-deployment.md |
| Profile path differences |
#4682 |
profile-migration.md |
| Removed cmdlets/features (WMI, Workflow, EventLog) |
Referenced in differences doc |
script-compatibility-audit.md |
| Task Scheduler / PSScheduledJob removal |
Referenced in differences doc |
scheduled-tasks-automation.md |
Proposed file structure
whats-new/
Migrating-from-Windows-PowerShell-51-to-PowerShell-7.md ← rewritten as phased playbook
migration/
script-compatibility-audit.md (~400 lines)
module-compatibility-strategy.md (~350 lines)
encoding-changes.md (~350 lines)
profile-migration.md (~250 lines)
enterprise-deployment.md (~350 lines)
scheduled-tasks-automation.md (~250 lines)
testing-and-rollback.md (~250 lines)
Updates to existing files (cross-links only):
differences-from-windows-powershell.md — NOTE box linking to migration guide
module-compatibility.md — expanded "Finding the status" section + link to new article
toc.yml — migration subsection under "What's New"
overview.yml — migration card on landing page
Total: 15 files, ~2,700 lines new content (within the 50-file limit)
Design principles
- Hub-and-spoke: the rewritten migration doc links to deep-dives, never duplicates
- Actionable: every section has concrete steps, scripts, or checklists
- Issue-backed: every pain point references real GitHub issues
- Non-duplicating: spoke articles link to specific
## anchors in the differences doc
- Style-compliant: 100-char lines, ATX headers, backtick fences, dash lists, proper name capitalization
Questions for maintainers
-
Directory location: Is whats-new/migration/ the right place for the new articles,
or would you prefer flat files in whats-new/ with a migration- prefix?
-
TOC structure: Should migration be a subsection under "What's New in PowerShell",
or elevated to its own top-level section in the TOC?
-
TOC modification: Is it acceptable for a community PR to modify toc.yml,
or should maintainers handle TOC changes after merge?
Prior contribution context
I recently contributed PR #12890 (+2,800/-278 across 30 files) which overhauled the
error handling documentation. This proposal is a similar scope and follows the same
quality standards.
Summary
The current migration doc (Migrating from Windows PowerShell 5.1 to PowerShell 7)
is a feature overview, not a migration guide. It tells readers what PowerShell 7 offers
but not how to migrate. The differences doc is a thorough technical reference,
but it is not actionable — it lists what changed without explaining what to do about it.
This proposal restructures the migration story into a hub-and-spoke model:
Pain points covered (with issue evidence)
Every proposed article addresses real pain points backed by community issue data:
module-compatibility-strategy.mdmodule-compatibility-strategy.mdencoding-changes.mdenterprise-deployment.mdprofile-migration.mdscript-compatibility-audit.mdscheduled-tasks-automation.mdProposed file structure
Updates to existing files (cross-links only):
differences-from-windows-powershell.md— NOTE box linking to migration guidemodule-compatibility.md— expanded "Finding the status" section + link to new articletoc.yml— migration subsection under "What's New"overview.yml— migration card on landing pageTotal: 15 files, ~2,700 lines new content (within the 50-file limit)
Design principles
##anchors in the differences docQuestions for maintainers
Directory location: Is
whats-new/migration/the right place for the new articles,or would you prefer flat files in
whats-new/with amigration-prefix?TOC structure: Should migration be a subsection under "What's New in PowerShell",
or elevated to its own top-level section in the TOC?
TOC modification: Is it acceptable for a community PR to modify
toc.yml,or should maintainers handle TOC changes after merge?
Prior contribution context
I recently contributed PR #12890 (+2,800/-278 across 30 files) which overhauled the
error handling documentation. This proposal is a similar scope and follows the same
quality standards.