Skip to content

Commit f4a42f8

Browse files
rafaeljwgregkh
authored andcommitted
ACPI / scan: Prefer devices without _HID/_CID for _ADR matching
[ Upstream commit c2a6bbaf0c5f90463a7011a295bbdb7e33c80b51 ] The way acpi_find_child_device() works currently is that, if there are two (or more) devices with the same _ADR value in the same namespace scope (which is not specifically allowed by the spec and the OS behavior in that case is not defined), the first one of them found to be present (with the help of _STA) will be returned. This covers the majority of cases, but is not sufficient if some of the devices in question have a _HID (or _CID) returning some valid ACPI/PNP device IDs (which is disallowed by the spec) and the ASL writers' expectation appears to be that the OS will match devices without a valid ACPI/PNP device ID against a given bus address first. To cover this special case as well, modify find_child_checks() to prefer devices without ACPI/PNP device IDs over devices that have them. Suggested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
1 parent 8c065e7 commit f4a42f8

1 file changed

Lines changed: 9 additions & 1 deletion

File tree

drivers/acpi/glue.c

Lines changed: 9 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -98,7 +98,15 @@ static int find_child_checks(struct acpi_device *adev, bool check_children)
9898
if (check_children && list_empty(&adev->children))
9999
return -ENODEV;
100100

101-
return sta_present ? FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE : FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE;
101+
/*
102+
* If the device has a _HID (or _CID) returning a valid ACPI/PNP
103+
* device ID, it is better to make it look less attractive here, so that
104+
* the other device with the same _ADR value (that may not have a valid
105+
* device ID) can be matched going forward. [This means a second spec
106+
* violation in a row, so whatever we do here is best effort anyway.]
107+
*/
108+
return sta_present && list_empty(&adev->pnp.ids) ?
109+
FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE : FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE;
102110
}
103111

104112
struct acpi_device *acpi_find_child_device(struct acpi_device *parent,

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)