Skip to content

Actions: github/codeql

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
10,589 workflow run results
10,589 workflow run results

Filter by Workflow

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Event

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Status

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Branch

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Actor

⌥ + click/return to exclude
Java: Add new quality query to detect finalize calls Ruby: Run RTJO Language Tests #402: Pull request #19075 labeled by jcogs33
1s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
1s
Java: Add new quality query to detect finalize calls Check change note #30771: Pull request #19075 labeled by jcogs33
9s
9s
Comment on PR with framework coverage changes Comment on PR with framework coverage changes #24140: completed by jcogs33
34s
34s
Java: Add new quality query to detect finalize calls Pull Request Labeler #45191: Pull request #19075 synchronize by jcogs33
12s
12s
Java: Add new quality query to detect finalize calls Check change note #30770: Pull request #19075 synchronize by jcogs33
10s
10s
Java: Add new quality query to detect finalize calls Ruby: Run RTJO Language Tests #401: Pull request #19075 synchronize by jcogs33
1s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
1s
Java: Add new quality query to detect finalize calls Compile all queries using the latest stable CodeQL CLI #28970: Pull request #19075 synchronize by jcogs33
2m 35s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
2m 35s
Java: Add new quality query to detect finalize calls Check framework coverage changes #25688: Pull request #19075 synchronize by jcogs33
2m 29s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
2m 29s
Java: Add new quality query to detect finalize calls Check query IDs #5475: Pull request #19075 synchronize by jcogs33
20s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
20s
Java: Add new quality query to detect finalize calls Run QL for QL #38470: Pull request #19075 synchronize by jcogs33
4m 49s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
4m 49s
Java: Add new quality query to detect finalize calls Check synchronized files #41530: Pull request #19075 synchronize by jcogs33
19s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/do-not-use-finalizers
19s
Comment on PR with framework coverage changes Comment on PR with framework coverage changes #24139: completed by jcogs33
31s
31s
Java: Add new quality query to detect missing @Nested annotation in JUnit5 tests Check framework coverage changes #25687: Pull request #19094 synchronize by jcogs33
2m 32s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
2m 32s
Java: Add new quality query to detect missing @Nested annotation in JUnit5 tests Check QLdoc coverage #18055: Pull request #19094 synchronize by jcogs33
2m 24s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
2m 24s
Java: Add new quality query to detect missing @Nested annotation in JUnit5 tests Compile all queries using the latest stable CodeQL CLI #28969: Pull request #19094 synchronize by jcogs33
12m 49s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
12m 49s
Java: Add new quality query to detect missing @Nested annotation in JUnit5 tests Run QL for QL #38469: Pull request #19094 synchronize by jcogs33
4m 58s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
4m 58s
Java: Add new quality query to detect missing @Nested annotation in JUnit5 tests Ruby: Run RTJO Language Tests #400: Pull request #19094 synchronize by jcogs33
1s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
1s
Java: Add new quality query to detect missing @Nested annotation in JUnit5 tests Check synchronized files #41529: Pull request #19094 synchronize by jcogs33
18s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
18s
Java: Add new quality query to detect missing @Nested annotation in JUnit5 tests Check query IDs #5474: Pull request #19094 synchronize by jcogs33
21s jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
jcogs33:jcogs33/java/junit5-missing-nested-annotation
21s
Java: Add new quality query to detect missing @Nested annotation in JUnit5 tests Pull Request Labeler #45190: Pull request #19094 synchronize by jcogs33
10s
10s
Java: Add new quality query to detect missing @Nested annotation in JUnit5 tests Check change note #30769: Pull request #19094 synchronize by jcogs33
11s
11s
Comment on PR with framework coverage changes Comment on PR with framework coverage changes #24138: completed by geoffw0
29s
29s
Rust: Define queries more consistently and include all sinks in stats Ruby: Run RTJO Language Tests #399: Pull request #19222 labeled by geoffw0
Skipped geoffw0:sinkstats
geoffw0:sinkstats
Skipped
Rust: Define queries more consistently and include all sinks in stats Go: Run RTJO Tests #42: Pull request #19222 labeled by geoffw0
Skipped geoffw0:sinkstats
geoffw0:sinkstats
Skipped
Rust: Define queries more consistently and include all sinks in stats Pull Request Labeler #45189: Pull request #19222 opened by geoffw0
10s
10s
ProTip! You can narrow down the results and go further in time using created:<2025-04-04 or the other filters available.