|
32 | 32 | <p>Use MATLAB to optimize solar panel geometry to maximize solar irradiance and energy production.</p> |
33 | 33 | <strong>Learning Outcomes:</strong> |
34 | 34 | <ul><li>Formulate a real-world problem as a mathematical optimization problem</li> |
35 | | -<li>Use MATLAB's `fmincon` for constrained nonlinear optimization</li> |
36 | | -<li>Visualize and interpret multivariable objective functions</li></ul></td> |
| 35 | +<li>Apply constrained nonliner optimization principles with computational tools, such as MATLAB's `fmincon` </li> |
| 36 | +<li>Analyze and interpret multivariable objective functions through visualization techniques</li></ul></td> |
37 | 37 | </tbody> |
38 | 38 |
|
39 | 39 | <tbody> |
40 | 40 | <td><img src="https://gist.githubusercontent.com/robertogl/e0115dc303472a9cfd52bbbc8edb7665/raw/defectDetection.png" width=500 /></td> |
41 | 41 | <td><p><h2><a href="https://github.com/mathworks/MATLAB-Simulink-Challenge-Project-Hub/tree/main/Classroom%20Challenge%20Projects/Projects/Image-Based%20Defect%20Detection%20for%20Manufacturing%20Inspection">Image-Based Defect Detection for Manufacturing Inspection</a></h2></p> |
42 | 42 | <p>Build a MATLAB inspection pipeline to detect manufacturing defects image processing.</p> |
43 | 43 | <strong>Learning Outcomes:</strong> |
44 | | -<ul><li>Build a hybrid classical‑vision + AI inspection workflow that mirrors modern manufacturing practice (preprocess → evidence → AI decision → test → report).</li> |
45 | | -<li>Implement traceable defect‑evidence generation, including segmentation masks, measurable features, and overlays for explanation and debugging.</li> |
| 44 | +<ul><li>Apply understanding of integrated classical-vision and AI inspection workflows and their role in modern manufacturing practice to design a fully automated inspection function.</li> |
| 45 | +<li>Analyze different forms of visual evidence to implement traceable defect‑evidence generation, with a design emphasis on the system's transparency, interpretability, and diagnostic insight.</li> |
46 | 46 | <li>Perform transfer learning using a MathWorks‑provided pretrained network (recommended: ResNet‑18) for part‑quality classification.</li> |
47 | | -<li>Design a fully automated inspection function that produces PASS/FAIL decisions, confidence scores, defect evidence, and rule‑based fallbacks.</li> |
48 | | -<li>Evaluate inspection performance and robustness via a batch test suite, confusion matrix, yield/defect statistics, and perturbation tests (lighting, blur, noise).</li> |
49 | | -<li>Understand the relationship between classical preprocessing, evidence metrics, and AI decisions, and how hybrid logic increases stability and interpretability.</li></ul></td> |
| 47 | +<li>Evaluate inspection performance and robustness via a batch test suite, confusion matrix, yield/defect statistics, and perturbation tests (lighting, blur, noise).</li></ul></td> |
50 | 48 | </tbody> |
51 | 49 |
|
52 | 50 | <tbody> |
|
55 | 53 | <p>Design a lightweight but strong drone payload structure by applying core statics principles such as equilibrium, moments, trusses, and center‑of‑mass analysis.</p> |
56 | 54 | <strong>Learning Outcomes: </strong> |
57 | 55 | <ul><li>Apply statics concepts (equilibrium, free‑body diagrams, trusses, and moments) to a real engineering system.</li> |
58 | | -<li> Estimate structural loads and evaluate design tradeoffs between strength and weight.</li> |
59 | | -<li> Use MATLAB to compute forces, moments, and center‑of‑mass positions, and to generate structural diagrams.</li> |
60 | | -<li> Validate and compare structural design concepts through simulation</li> |
61 | | -<li> Understand how payload placement and structural design influence drone stability and performance.</li></p></ul></td> |
| 56 | +<li> Analyze structural loads, material choices and design tradeoffs with MATLAB-based computation of forces, moments, and center-of-mass positions.</li> |
| 57 | +<li> Evaluate structual design concepts through simulation, with an emphasis on understanding how payload placement and structural design influence drone stability and performance.</li></p></ul></td> |
62 | 58 | </tbody> |
63 | 59 | </table> |
64 | 60 |
|
|
0 commit comments