Skip to content

{Misc} Rename CODEOWNERS to OWNERS - #34246

Merged
Yu Chen (jsntcy) merged 1 commit into
Azure:devfrom
jsntcy:ychenu/disable-codeowners
Oct 21, 2026
Merged

Yu Chen (jsntcy) merged 1 commit into
Azure:devfrom
jsntcy:ychenu/disable-codeowners

Conversation

@jsntcy

@jsntcy Yu Chen (jsntcy) commented Oct 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🤖 PR Validation — ️✔️ All clear

Breaking Changes Tests
️✔️ None ️✔️ 130/130

Description

Why do we rename CODEOWNERS to OWNERS?

As we move to a squad-based Scrum Master model, CODEOWNERS has become a bottleneck for code review productivity.

After we renamed CODEOWNERS to OWNERS, GitHub will then treat it (OWNERS) as a normal file, so we can keep the ownership information without triggering the built-in CODEOWNERS behavior (Merging will be blocked by owner's approval).

This also prevents GitHub from automatically requesting reviews from the listed owners, which no longer matches our process. Instead, the squad, acting as the Scrum Master, should be assigned as the reviewer.

Testing Guide

History Notes


This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request. Check if the Files changed in this pull request are included in default exclusions.

@yonzhan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Misc

@jsntcy
Yu Chen (jsntcy) merged commit 3cce072 into Azure:dev Oct 21, 2026
59 of 60 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants