Skip to content

Go SDK: reject a task handler and a Dag that share a dag_id - #73876

Merged
jason810496 merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
FrankYang0529:airflow-go-sdk-reject-shared-dag-id
Oct 1, 2026
Merged

jason810496 merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
FrankYang0529:airflow-go-sdk-reject-shared-dag-id

Conversation

@FrankYang0529

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Followup for #73767 (comment).

BundleRef.Register panics when a task handler from airflow.TaskHandler and a Dag from airflow.Dag use the same dag_id, in either registration order.


Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes - Claude Code

  • Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
  • For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
  • When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
  • For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

Signed-off-by: PoAn Yang <payang@apache.org>
@FrankYang0529
FrankYang0529 force-pushed the airflow-go-sdk-reject-shared-dag-id branch from a924c0c to e168a07 Compare September 29, 2026 11:26
@FrankYang0529
FrankYang0529 marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2026 09:23

@jason810496 jason810496 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, this is exactly what I think the validation should cover.

@jason810496
jason810496 merged commit 529f429 into apache:main Oct 1, 2026
173 checks passed
@FrankYang0529
FrankYang0529 deleted the airflow-go-sdk-reject-shared-dag-id branch October 1, 2026 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants