Repository navigation
GH-43851: [C++][Compute] Drop logical nulls from union values across containers #54725
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
xgbtxy
wants to merge
2
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
xgbtxy:fix/gh-43851-drop-null-unions
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Scenario: all values are null and the union has a bool8 extension child. MakeEmptyArray fails because it needs a builder for the extension, no? Same for chunked path.
Can we cover both dense and sparse unions with extension children?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirmed: the new bool8-child regression fails on the initial PR head with
MakeBuilder: cannot construct builder for type extension<arrow.bool8>.The same follow-up commit uses
MakeArrayOfNull(type, 0)for empty unions across the array, chunked-array and record-batch paths; the table path uses the corrected batch handling. This avoids extension builders and retaining input buffers, while preserving the existing empty construction for non-union types.Added dense/sparse coverage for all-null Array, ChunkedArray, RecordBatch and Table inputs, plus mixed values, slices and chunking. The full selection suite passes: 171 tests, one existing disabled test.