Skip to content

io_result can be co_yielded in io_task#301

Closed
klemens-morgenstern wants to merge 1 commit into
cppalliance:developfrom
klemens-morgenstern:co_yield
Closed

io_result can be co_yielded in io_task#301
klemens-morgenstern wants to merge 1 commit into
cppalliance:developfrom
klemens-morgenstern:co_yield

Conversation

@klemens-morgenstern
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@cppalliance-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

An automated preview of the documentation is available at https://301.capy.prtest3.cppalliance.org/index.html

If more commits are pushed to the pull request, the docs will rebuild at the same URL.

2026-06-04 15:16:57 UTC

@cppalliance-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

GCOVR code coverage report https://301.capy.prtest3.cppalliance.org/gcovr/index.html
LCOV code coverage report https://301.capy.prtest3.cppalliance.org/genhtml/index.html
Coverage Diff Report https://301.capy.prtest3.cppalliance.org/diff-report/index.html

Build time: 2026-06-04 15:34:56 UTC

@klemens-morgenstern
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The Idea was rejected by vinnie.

Vinnie  [2:05 AM] I don't like it
Vinnie  [2:06 AM] In principle I like making things more ergonomic, so it is an interesting idea. But it turns co_yield into a different idiom. And it also supports std::execution::task 's decision to return using co_yield, which I don't like.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants