Skip to content

hub: add cloudsmith integration#25477

Open
craig-osterhout wants to merge 1 commit into
docker:mainfrom
craig-osterhout:engdocs-3320
Open

hub: add cloudsmith integration#25477
craig-osterhout wants to merge 1 commit into
docker:mainfrom
craig-osterhout:engdocs-3320

Conversation

@craig-osterhout

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Added release note for Cloudsmith integration with Hub. No how-to as the user-facing portion is configured on third-party.

Related issues or tickets

ENGDOCS-3320

Reviews

  • Editorial review
  • Product review

Signed-off-by: Craig Osterhout <craig.osterhout@docker.com>
@craig-osterhout craig-osterhout requested review from a team and jtwils17 July 1, 2026 16:18
@craig-osterhout craig-osterhout added the status/review Pull requests that are ready for review label Jul 1, 2026
@netlify

netlify Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploy Preview for docsdocker ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5dbe43b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/docsdocker/deploys/6a453de8b5e9560008a89e45
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-25477--docsdocker.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area/hub Issue affects Docker Hub label Jul 1, 2026

@docker-agent docker-agent left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assessment: 🟢 APPROVE

The release note for the Cloudsmith integration is well-written and follows Docker documentation style guidelines. No high or medium severity issues were found.

@docker-agent docker-agent left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assessment: 🟢 APPROVE

The release note entry for the Cloudsmith integration is clean and well-scoped. The prose avoids hedge words and marketing language, uses active framing, and the link to Cloudsmith's changelog is properly formatted. No style violations, markdown issues, or content accuracy problems detected.

@docker-agent docker-agent left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assessment: 🟢 APPROVE

The release note entry for the Cloudsmith integration is concise, accurate, and well-scoped. Writing is factual and style-compliant: no hedge words, no marketing language, uses "letting" rather than "enables you to", no passive voice issues, and no formatting problems. Multi-line link text is valid CommonMark/Hugo Markdown. No vendored files were touched, front matter was not changed, and no pages were removed so no redirect check needed.

@aevesdocker aevesdocker left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/hub Issue affects Docker Hub status/review Pull requests that are ready for review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants