Skip to content

docs: refresh stale README content - #10

Merged
Bccorb merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-stale-content
Oct 7, 2026
Merged

Bccorb merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-stale-content

Conversation

@Bccorb

@Bccorb Bccorb commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Private repo reference: removes the mention of a private repository from the public README's "Relationship To SeamlessAuth" section.
  • Version wording: "For 0.1.0" / "0.1.0 coverage" (the packages are 0.2.0) becomes version-neutral "Current scope" wording in the root, aws, and twilio READMEs.
  • Consumer: the README names seamless-auth-api as the consumer, building its service with createAuthMessagingService(...) and the AWS and Twilio transports. The API on main imports these in src/config/directMessaging.ts and src/services/messagingService.ts. The seamless-auth-server adapters do not depend on these packages.
  • Flows: the root README now lists all four flows AuthMessagingService implements, adding the passkey enrollment invite email. The core README adds sendEnrollmentInviteEmail(...), which is exported on main and used by the API's enrollmentService.ts.

Docs only. The root package.json version is unchanged.

Testing

npm run format:check, npm run lint, and npm test (10 passed) pass.

The READMEs described the scope as "0.1.0" while every package is at
0.2.0. Use version-neutral "Current scope" wording so it does not go
stale again, and list the passkey enrollment invite email alongside the
other flows, since packages/core exports sendEnrollmentInviteEmail.

Name seamless-auth-api as the consumer. It builds its messaging service
from these packages; seamless-auth-server does not depend on them, and
createSeamlessAuthServer(...) never used them.

Drop the reference to a private repository from the public README.
@Bccorb
Bccorb merged commit 96f68b7 into main Oct 7, 2026
3 checks passed
@Bccorb
Bccorb deleted the docs/readme-stale-content branch October 15, 2026 03:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant