Add feature profiles and graph data model#323
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 29 minutes and 15 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (28)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
flyingrobots
changed the title
Owner
Author
|
@codex Self-Code Review findings for PR #323.
Summary: 7 issues found (P2: 2, P3: 2, P4: 2, P5: 1). No P0/P1 runtime blockers found; the branch is docs-only, but the graph model should be corrected before it becomes the implementation contract. |
|
Summary
Commit / PR
Testing
|
Owner
Author
|
@codex Code Lawyer re-audit findings for PR #323.
Summary: 2 new issues found in this re-audit (P3: 1, P4: 1). No unresolved GitHub review threads were present; these are self-discovered issues from |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 9b5006c387
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Owner
Author
|
@codex Activity Summary for PR #323 Code Lawyer re-audit.
Verification:
Unresolved GitHub review threads: 0. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Summary
Testing
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Title
Add feature profiles and graph data model
Summary
Graph Data Model Usagesections with Mermaid examples to every feature profile.Problem Statement
Git Mind has a mature graph substrate but needs sharper product-facing specifications before the next implementation wave. This PR turns the current product direction into reviewable design artifacts with explicit IBM Design Thinking framing, playback evidence, graph vocabulary, and test expectations.
ADR Compliance (Required)
Relevant ADR(s)
Compliance Declaration
Exception Request (Required if deviating)
Architecture Laws Checklist (Hard Gates)
Canonical Truth & Context
--at,--observer,--trust) or deterministically defaulted.Determinism & Provenance
Artifact Hygiene
Contracts & Compatibility
Extension/Effects Safety (if applicable)
Scope Control
Backward Compatibility
Test Plan (Required)
Unit
# Not run; docs-only change with no runtime logic changes.Integration
# Not run; docs-only change with no integration behavior changes.Determinism
Contract/Schema
# Not applicable; no machine schema changed.Policy Gates
Security / Trust Impact
Performance Impact
Observability / Debuggability
Operational Notes
Linked Issues / Milestones
Reviewer Quick Verdict Block (for maintainers)
MUST (Hard Gates)
SHOULD (Quality)
Verdict