Skip to content

doc(multi-slb): add IP sharing behaviour#10191

Open
Liunardy wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:documentationfrom
Liunardy:liunady/multi-slb-ip-share-doc
Open

doc(multi-slb): add IP sharing behaviour#10191
Liunardy wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:documentationfrom
Liunardy:liunady/multi-slb-ip-share-doc

Conversation

@Liunardy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add multi-SLB IP-sharing behaviour from #9937.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. labels Apr 17, 2026
@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Apr 17, 2026

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-cloud-provide-azure ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 37f2e2b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/kubernetes-sigs-cloud-provide-azure/deploys/69e1886aa4d4ac00082f9373
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10191--kubernetes-sigs-cloud-provide-azure.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 17, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Liunardy
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign lzhecheng for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Apr 17, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @Liunardy. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 17, 2026
@Liunardy Liunardy closed this Apr 17, 2026
@Liunardy Liunardy reopened this Apr 17, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Apr 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants