Skip to content

Static Sparkline#165

Closed
mxdvl wants to merge 2 commits intonpmx-dev:mainfrom
mxdvl:mxdvl/ssr-sparkline
Closed

Static Sparkline#165
mxdvl wants to merge 2 commits intonpmx-dev:mainfrom
mxdvl:mxdvl/ssr-sparkline

Conversation

@mxdvl
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@mxdvl mxdvl commented Jan 27, 2026

What does this change?

Implements a sparkline without the interaction, closes #116

image

without the interaction
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented Jan 27, 2026

@mxdvl is attempting to deploy a commit to the danielroe Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

no hardocded dimensions
@mxdvl mxdvl mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2026
@mxdvl
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

mxdvl commented Jan 28, 2026

We’ve gone a different way with #214

@mxdvl mxdvl closed this Jan 28, 2026
@mxdvl mxdvl deleted the mxdvl/ssr-sparkline branch January 28, 2026 09:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

An SSR-friendly Sparkline

1 participant