Skip to content

Indiana Jones G-Mode Restructure#2169

Merged
kjbranch merged 2 commits intovg-json-data:masterfrom
kjbranch:g-pcjr
Jul 26, 2025
Merged

Indiana Jones G-Mode Restructure#2169
kjbranch merged 2 commits intovg-json-data:masterfrom
kjbranch:g-pcjr

Conversation

@kjbranch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This was done to clean up the strats and make it more clear what to do. There is a lot going on still, so maybe it would be worth adding a junction node back, but it is not immediately clear how to best do that.

Also worth noting that the some of the old artificial morph strats required "canIBJ" instead of its morphless variant.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@osse101 osse101 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A GMode node looks useful but I also don't see it saving lines of code. There are the traversal nodes that come together to IBJ to the item then fall before branching again. And there are Remote Acquire And strats that would continue on to PB the blocks?
So I don't see groupings being large enough to be of much help.

@kjbranch kjbranch merged commit a4182d7 into vg-json-data:master Jul 26, 2025
1 check passed
@kjbranch kjbranch deleted the g-pcjr branch July 26, 2025 18:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants