Skip to content

chore: regenerate server-card.json for 2.2.3 - #838

Merged
zereight merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/server-card-2.2.3
Oct 12, 2026
Merged

zereight merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/server-card-2.2.3

Conversation

@zereight

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Regenerated .well-known/mcp/server-card.json with scripts/generate-server-card.ts.

The only change is serverInfo.version, which was still 2.2.1 while package.json is 2.2.3. Tool definitions (274) already matched tools/registry.ts.

Found by the daily docs sync check. Other checks passed with no changes: check:skill-sync, docs:tools, tool counts across READMEs/DOCKERHUB, README tool list, translated README flags/env vars/links, env var reference, mkdocs nav.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration
  • Configuration used: Organization UI
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: e5c8e70e-18a1-444b-985a-2cc01c55b5c7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8036c1 and b707f43.


📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .well-known/mcp/server-card.json

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 6 remain after this review.


📜 Recent review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (9)
  • GitHub Check: schema-tests
  • GitHub Check: docs-build
  • GitHub Check: integration-test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: code-quality
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (ruby)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.well-known/mcp/server-card.json (1)

4-4: LGTM!



📝 Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Updates
    • Updated the MCP server card version to 2.2.3.

Walkthrough

The MCP server card version changes from 2.2.1 to 2.2.3.

Changes

MCP server card version

Layer / File(s) Summary
Update declared version
.well-known/mcp/server-card.json
The server card version changes from 2.2.1 to 2.2.3.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Other

Suggested reviewers: cursoragent


Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to b707f

The server card now matches the package version used to generate it; no material merge risk is apparent.

Pre-merge checks | Passed 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title clearly identifies the regeneration of server-card.json and the version update to 2.2.3.
Description check Passed The description accurately explains the regenerated file, the version mismatch, the source version, and the validation results.
Docstring Coverage Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR

✨ Simplify code
  • Commit to this branch
  • Create a new PR

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@zereight
zereight merged commit 3a5dff6 into main Oct 12, 2026
12 checks passed
@zereight

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Cursor CLI review (zereight / grok-4.7-high): APPROVE — metadata-only .well-known/mcp/server-card.json version sync 2.2.1 → 2.2.3. No P0/P1. (GitHub blocks self-approve on own PR; CodeRabbit already APPROVED.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant