-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 786
fix: Protect mem consumption from null deref #4895
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
lum1n0us
wants to merge
1
commit into
bytecodealliance:main
Choose a base branch
from
lum1n0us:fix/memory-consumption-null-deref
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+43
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -3445,9 +3445,11 @@ wasm_deinstantiate(WASMModuleInstance *module_inst, bool is_sub_inst) | |
| (WASMModuleInstanceCommon *)module_inst); | ||
| #endif | ||
|
|
||
| if (module_inst->memory_count > 0) | ||
| if (module_inst->memory_count > 0) { | ||
| memories_deinstantiate(module_inst, module_inst->memories, | ||
| module_inst->memory_count); | ||
| module_inst->memories = NULL; | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think it's worth setting NULL here? Given the fact that this module inst is about to be destroyed anyway? It will create an inconsistency with other data members, like L3455 |
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (module_inst->import_func_ptrs) { | ||
| wasm_runtime_free(module_inst->import_func_ptrs); | ||
|
|
@@ -4227,13 +4229,32 @@ wasm_get_module_mem_consumption(const WASMModule *module, | |
| mem_conspn->total_size += mem_conspn->const_strs_size; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /** | ||
| * Calculate memory consumption of a WASM module instance. | ||
| * | ||
| * @param module_inst pointer to a fully initialized WASM module instance | ||
| * @param mem_conspn output structure to store memory consumption details | ||
| * | ||
| * @pre module_inst != NULL | ||
| * @pre module_inst->module != NULL | ||
| * @pre module_inst->e != NULL | ||
| * @pre (module_inst->memory_count == 0) || (module_inst->memories != NULL) | ||
| * | ||
| * In debug builds, these preconditions are validated with bh_assert. | ||
| * In release builds, violating preconditions results in undefined behavior. | ||
| */ | ||
| void | ||
| wasm_get_module_inst_mem_consumption(const WASMModuleInstance *module_inst, | ||
| WASMModuleInstMemConsumption *mem_conspn) | ||
| { | ||
| uint32 i; | ||
| uint64 size; | ||
|
|
||
| bh_assert(module_inst); | ||
| bh_assert(module_inst->module); | ||
| bh_assert(module_inst->e); | ||
| bh_assert(!module_inst->memory_count || module_inst->memories); | ||
|
|
||
| memset(mem_conspn, 0, sizeof(*mem_conspn)); | ||
|
|
||
| mem_conspn->module_inst_struct_size = (uint8 *)module_inst->e | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's worth setting NULL here? Given the fact that the module instance will be destroyed later anyway?